Socio-pragmatic study of lexico-taboo expressions

An analysis of taboo expressions used by Iraqi students in Diyala University

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS4.9527

Authors

Keywords:

socio-pragmatic study, lexico-taboo expressions, students

Abstract

This study sheds light on different genres of taboo expressions used by students of the college of basic education in Diyala University. It investigates them according to the context in which they are used and the socio-cultural factors that affect their use. It clarifies why certain expressions are considered to be taboo words inside the campus, and it also discusses the way by which those expressions are accompanied conventionally. The collected expressions of the target environment have been translated, phonologically transcribed. Then, they are divided into five genres i.e. epithets, profanities, obscenities, cursing, and sexual harassment. The researcher concludes that students use such taboo expressions either to make the situation humorous, or they use them for the sake of catharsis, or to show the power.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allan, K. and K. Burridge (2006). Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge.

Battistella, Edwin.L. 2005. Bad Language: Are Some Words Better than Others? NewYork: Oxford University Press.

Coates, Jennifer. 2004. Women, Men and Language. Third edition. London: Pearson ESL

Freud, S. 1999. Totem and Taboo. Trans. James Strachey. London: Routledge.

Hongxu, H & Guisen, T. (1990). “A Sociolinguistic View of Linguistic Taboo in Chinese”. International Journal of Society and Language, 81, 63-85.

Jay, Timothy. 1996. What to Do When Your Students Talk Dirty. Atrium Publishers Group.

Jay, Timothy. 1999. Why We Curse. Philadelphia, PA, USA: John Benjamins.

Lakoff, Robin. 2004. Language and Woman’s Place: Text and Commentaries.London: Oxford University Press.

Montagu, Ashley. 2001. The Anatomy of Swearing. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Qanbar, N. (2011). A Sociolinguistic Study of The linguistic Taboos in the Yemeni Society:. University Researcher. Ibb University, Vol. 19: 29 – 44.

Trudgill, P. (1974). Sex, covert prestige, and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society, 1, 1, 79-95.

Trudgill, P. (1983). Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell.142

Trudgill, Peter. 2000. Sociolinguistics: An Introduction to Language and Society.Fourth edition. London: Penguin.

Wardhaugh, R. (1986). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. New York: Mc Graw Hill.

Wardhaugh, R. (1998). Introduction to Linguistics. New York: Mc Graw Hill.

Wardhaugh.R. 1984. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Sarada, V., & Mallikarjuna, T. (2018). Socio-economic and psychological problems of third gender people living with HIV/AIDS: A study in A.P. International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 1(1), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijhms.v1n1.34

Widana, I.K., Dewi, G.A.O.C., Suryasa, W. (2020). Ergonomics approach to improve student concentration on learning process of professional ethics. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12(7), 429-445.

Published

23-06-2022

How to Cite

Abdalhakeem, S. H. (2022). Socio-pragmatic study of lexico-taboo expressions: An analysis of taboo expressions used by Iraqi students in Diyala University. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S4), 6045–6058. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS4.9527

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles