Beyond quality and income
Poultry products preferences and food values in urban area of Chhattisgarh
Keywords:
income, food values, qualityAbstract
The demographic for the answer is made up of Indian customers, namely those from the state of Chhattisgarh, which has a diversified population. Though the study discloses Indian consumers' views, it restricts the likelihood of the western world adopting them. Several poultry products have yet to be discovered due to a paucity of resources. The research data is examined using ANOVA, although there is space for further analysis using several alternative statistical tools.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, A. (2013). Rural Marketing Strategies for Selling Products & Services: Issues & Challenges. Jbm&Ssr, 2(1), 55–60. http://www.ijtbm.com/webmaster/upload/Sep_2013_Vikas Singh.pdf
AL-NASSER, A. (2006). Poultry industry in Kuwait. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 62(4), 702–708. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004393390600122X
Arnawa, I.K., Sapanca, P.L.Y., Martini, L.K.B., Udayana, I.G.B., Suryasa, W. (2019). Food security program towards community food consumption. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 11(2), 1198-1210.
Bannor, R. K., Abele, S., Kuwornu, J. K. M., Oppong-Kyeremeh, H., & Yeboah, E. D. (2022). Consumer segmentation and preference for indigenous chicken products. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 12(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-08-2020-0162
Benda-Prokeinová, R., & Hanová, M. (2016). Consumer’s Behavior of the Foodstuff Consumption in Slovakia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 220, 21–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.465
Bett, H. K., Peters, K. J., Nwankwo, U. M., & Bokelmann, W. (2013). Estimating consumer preferences and willingness to pay for the underutilised indigenous chicken products. Food Policy, 41, 218–225. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.05.012
Bradford, H., McKernan, C., Elliott, C., & Dean, M. (2022). Consumers’ perceptions and willingness to purchase pork labelled ‘raised without antibiotics.’ Appetite, 171, 105900. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105900
Claret, A., Guerrero, L., Aguirre, E., Rincón, L., Hernández, M. D., Martínez, I., Benito Peleteiro, J., Grau, A., & Rodríguez-Rodríguez, C. (2012). Consumer preferences for sea fish using conjoint analysis: Exploratory study of the importance of country of origin, obtaining method, storage conditions and purchasing price. Food Quality and Preference, 26(2), 259–266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.05.006
Custodio, M. C., Ynion, J., Samaddar, A., Cuevas, R. P., Mohanty, S. K., Ray (Chakravarti), A., & Demont, M. (2021). Unraveling heterogeneity of consumers’ food choice: Implications for nutrition interventions in eastern India. Global Food Security, 28(August 2020), 100497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100497
da Rosa, P. P., Ávila, B. P., Costa, P. T., Fluck, A. C., Scheibler, R. B., Ferreira, O. G. L., & Gularte, M. A. (2019). Analysis of the perception and behavior of consumers regarding capybara meat by means of exploratory methods. Meat Science, 152, 81–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.02.011
de Oliveira Padilha, L. G., Malek, L., & Umberger, W. J. (2022a). Consumers’ attitudes towards lab-grown meat, conventionally raised meat and plant-based protein alternatives. Food Quality and Preference, 99(May 2021), 104573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104573
de Oliveira Padilha, L. G., Malek, L., & Umberger, W. J. (2022b). Consumers’ attitudes towards lab-grown meat, conventionally raised meat and plant-based protein alternatives. Food Quality and Preference, 99, 104573. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104573
Gómez-Luciano, C. A., de Aguiar, L. K., Vriesekoop, F., & Urbano, B. (2019). Consumers’ willingness to purchase three alternatives to meat proteins in the United Kingdom, Spain, Brazil and the Dominican Republic. Food Quality and Preference, 78, 103732. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103732
Henn, K., Bøye Olsen, S., Goddyn, H., & Bredie, W. L. P. (2022). Willingness to replace animal-based products with pulses among consumers in different European countries. Food Research International, 111403. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111403
Indrawan, D., Tacken, G., & Hogeveen, H. (2018). What drives the choice of poultry market channel and the change of purchase behavior due to highly pathogenic avian influenza outbreaks? Poultry Science, 97(10), 3652–3660. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey222
Iris, G., Abraham, H., & Doron, K. (2018). Examination of the relationship between dietary choice and consumer preferences for sustainable near-food products in Israel. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.267
Kumar, S. P. S. and M. (2011). CONSUMER BEHAVIOR IN RURAL MARKETING-A NEW PARADIGM Dr.Satya Prakash Srivastava 1 Manish Kumar 2. Asian Journal of Technology and Management Research, 01(1), 1–14.
Lazzarini, G. A., Visschers, V. H. M., & Siegrist, M. (2018). How to improve consumers’ environmental sustainability judgements of foods. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 564–574. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.033
Liu, J., Tetens, I., & Bredie, W. L. P. (2022). Consumer perception and sensory properties of bakery products fortified with chicken protein for older adults. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 27, 100484. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2022.100484
McCarthy, M., O’Reilly, S., Cotter, L., & de Boer, M. (2004). Factors influencing consumption of pork and poultry in the Irish market. Appetite, 43(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2004.01.006
Michel, L. M., Punter, P. H., & Wismer, W. V. (2011). Perceptual attributes of poultry and other meat products: A repertory grid application. Meat Science, 87(4), 349–355. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.11.010
Mishra, M. (2011). Rural Products & its market in India : A literature Review. 9519, 151–153.
Niva, M., & Vainio, A. (2021). Towards more environmentally sustainable diets? Changes in the consumption of beef and plant- and insect-based protein products in consumer groups in Finland. Meat Science, 182(October 2020), 108635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2021.108635
Ofuoku, A. U., & Akusu, M. O. (2016). Preference and Willingness of Consumers to Pay for Value-added Poultry Products in Niger Delta Region of Nigeria. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University (English Edition), 23(4), 82–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-8104(17)30011-9
Profeta, A., & Hamm, U. (2019). Do consumers care about local feedstuffs in local food? Results from a German consumer study. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 88, 21–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2018.12.003
Reithmayer, C., & Mußhoff, O. (2019). Consumer preferences for alternatives to chick culling in Germany. Poultry Science, 98(10), 4539–4548. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez272
Rondoni, A., Asioli, D., & Millan, E. (2020). Consumer behaviour, perceptions, and preferences towards eggs: A review of the literature and discussion of industry implications. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 106, 391–401. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.10.038
Shan, L. C., Regan, Á., Monahan, F. J., Li, C., Lalor, F., Murrin, C., Wall, P. G., & McConnon, Á. (2017). Consumer preferences towards healthier reformulation of a range of processed meat products. British Food Journal, 119(9), 2013–2026. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-11-2016-0557
Shukla, S., & Tandon, N. (2011). Rural Marketing-Exploring New Possibilities in the Rural India. Gurukul Business Review-Gbr, 7(Spring), 125–130.
Teixeira, A., & Rodrigues, S. (2021). Consumer perceptions towards healthier meat products. Current Opinion in Food Science, 38, 147–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2020.12.004
Van Loo, E. J., Caputo, V., & Lusk, J. L. (2020). Consumer preferences for farm-raised meat, lab-grown meat, and plant-based meat alternatives: Does information or brand matter? Food Policy, 95, 101931. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101931
Verbeke, W., & Viaene, J. (1999). Beliefs, attitude and behaviour towards fresh meat consumption in Belgium: empirical evidence from a consumer survey. Food Quality and Preference, 10(6), 437–445. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(99)00031-2
Vukasovič, T. (2010). Buying decision‐making process for poultry meat. British Food Journal, 112(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070701011018815
Wilks, M. (2017). Consumer Attitudes and Acceptance of Clean Meat. In Reference Module in Food Science. Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.21892-1
Yi, H. T., Cha, Y. B., & Amenuvor, F. E. (2021). Effects of sales-related capabilities of personal selling organizations on individual sales capability, sales behaviors and sales performance in cosmetics personal selling channels. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073937
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of health sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
