The place of uterine artery and umbilical artery doppler in prediction of hypertensive disorders (pre-eclampsia) among pregnant women at a resource poor setting

A comparative study

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v8nS1.15119

Authors

  • Raphael Ugochukwu Chikezie Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria
  • Matthew Igwe Nwali Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria
  • Arinze Ikeotuonye Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria
  • Nwamaka Ugo-chikezie Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria
  • Fidelis Nwamkwo Anidiobi Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria
  • Ikechukwu B. O. Dimejesi Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria
  • Emmanuel Uchendu Radiology Department, AEFUTHA, Nigeria
  • Victor Onuchukwu Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria

Keywords:

Pre-eclampsia, uterine/umbilical arteries Doppler

Abstract

Background: Uterine and umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry have shown promise but the results of previous studies have not been conclusive/poor methodologies. Aim: To determine the predictive value of uterine and umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry for pre-eclampsia and pregnancy outcomes. Methods: A comparative study among 100 women who attended ante natal clinic in the hospital within the study period who has high risk for development of pre-eclampsia. The peak systolic velocity, end-diastolic velocity, Resistivity index, Pulsatility index and S/D ratio of the uterine and umbilical arteries were studied at 18-20 weeks and 36-37 weeks. sociodemographic data were recorded. Data were analysed using SPSS (version 26, Chicago11, USA). P value of ≤ 0.05 was significant. Results: Resistivity/Pulsatility indices at 18-20 weeks are better predictors of preeclampsia as against EDV at 36-37 weeks. Pregnant women at 18-20 weeks gestational showed that only mean RI (≈ 0.53  0.02) of the umbilical artery was associated with adverse outcome (p = 0.009). However, at 36-37 weeks, the mean uterine artery EDV of 14.69  2.04 was associated with adverse outcome (p = 0.001). Conclusion Adverse pregnancy outcome at n18-20 weeks was associated with resistivity index while EDV is more associated with adverse outcomes at 36-37 weeks. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lim K. Pre-eclampsia. www.emedicine.medscape.com/article/1476919-overview. 29th November, 2018. Accessed 17th December, 2020

Osungbade KO, Ige OK. Public Health perspectives of Pre-eclampsia in developing countries: Implication for health systems strengthening. J pregnancy. 2011; 2011: 481095. doi:10.1155/2011/481095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/481095

Uzan J, Carbonnel M, Piconne O, Asmar R, Ayoubi JM. Pre-eclampsia: Pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Vasc Health Risk MANAG. 2011; 7(2): 467-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S20181

Tasneem S, Nnaji A, Ozdal MA. Causes of maternal mortality in Nigeria: A systematic review. Int J Health Manag. 2019; 4(3): 200-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31201/ijhmt.633942

Okafor UV, Ezegwui HU. Caesarean delivery in Pre-eclampsia and seasonal variation in a tropical rainforest belt. J Postgrad Med. 2010; 56(1): 21-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0022-3859.62431

Hodgins S. Pre-eclampsia as underlying cause for perinatal deaths: Time for action. GHSP. 2015; 3(4): 525-527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00350

Meads CA, Cnossen JS, Meher S, Juarez-Garcia A, Ter-Reit G, Duley L et al. Methods of predicition and prevention of Pre-eclampsia: systematic reviews of accuracy and effectiveness literature with economic modelling. Health Technol Assess. 2008; 12(6):3-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3310/hta12060

Ronsmans C, Graham WJ. Lancet maternal survival series steering group, maternal mortality: who, when, where and why. Lancet. 2006; 368(1): 118-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69380-X

Gomez O, Martinez JM, Figueroa F, Del-Rio M, Borobio V, Puerto B et al. Uterine Doppler at 11-14 weeks of gestation to screen for Hypertensive disorders and associated complications in an unselected population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 26(2): 490-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.1976

Schwarze A, Welles I, Krapp M, Freidrich M, Schidmt W, Diedrich K et al. Doppler ultrasound of the uterine artery in prediction of severe complications during low risk pregnancies. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005; 271(1): 46-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-004-0646-6

Bhattacharya SK, Kundu S, Kabiraj SP. Prediction of Pre-eclampsia by mid-trimester uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in high risk and low risk women. JOGI. 2012; 62(3): 297-300 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-012-0219-8

Clapp JF. Physiologic adaptation to IUGR. In: Ward RH, Smith SK, Donnal D (eds). Early fetal development. London, UK: Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Pres;1994.pp 371-83

Woo JS, Liang ST, Lo RL. Significance of an absent or reversed end-diastolic flow in Doppler umbilical artery waveform. J Ultrasound Med. 1987; 6(2): 291-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.1987.6.6.291

Ayyuba R, Abubakar IS, Yakassai IA. Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry study on the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes among pregnant women with hypertensive disorders in Kano, Nigeria. NJBCS. 2015; 12(2): 95-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0331-8540.169296

August P, Sibai BM. Pre-eclampsia: clinical features and diagnosis. www.uptodate.com/contents/preeclampsia/clinical-features-and-diagnosis#topic-content. 26th June, 2020. Assessed 17th December, 2020

Brown MA, Magee LA, Kenny LC, Karumanchi SA, McCarthy FP, Shigeru S et al. The hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: ISSHP Classification, diagnosis and management recommendations for international practice. Available at http://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2018.05.004. Assessed 15th August, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2018.05.004

Angeli F, Angeli E, Reboldi G, Verdecchia P. Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy: clinical applicability of risk prediction models. J Hypertens. 2011; 29(3): 2320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834d6ed7

Myatt L, Clifton RG, Roberts JM. First trimester prediction of Pre-eclampsia in nulliparous women at low risk. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119: 1234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182571669

American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Gestational hyprtension and Pre-eclampsia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 22. Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 135(1): e237.

Christen HT, Falkenburg T, Lamont RF, Jorgensen JANS, Christian H. The impact of Vitamin D on pregnancy: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012; 91(5): 1357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12000

Kleinrouwler CE, Wiegernick MMJ, Ris-Staplers C, Bossuyt PMM, Van Der Post JAM, Von Dadelszen P et al. Accuracy of circulating placental growth factor soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 and soluble endoglin in the prediction of Pre-eclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2019; 119(1): 778-787 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03311.x

Allen RE, Rogozinska E, Cleverly K, Aquilinia J, Thangaratinam S. A bnormal blood biomarkers in early pregnancy are associated with Pre-eclampsia: a meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014; 182(1): 194-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.09.027

Townsend R, Rhalol A, Premakumar Y, Allotey J, Snell KIE, Chan C, Chappell LC et al. IPPIC Network. Prediction of Pre-eclampsia: review of reviews. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 54(1): 16-27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20117

Nagar T, Nagar RP, Gupta M. Biochemical parameters and fetomaternal outcome in Pre-eclampsia: a hospital based observational study. IJRCOG. 2018; 7(11): doi:http/dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog.20284527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20184527

Pettker CM, Campbell KH. Antepartum fetal assessment. In: Avery’s diseases of the newborn. Gleason CA, Juul S. 10th edition. Elsevier. 2018.pp 145-157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-40139-5.00014-0

Giles VB, Tradinger BJ, Baird PJ. Fetal umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms and placental resistance: pathological correlations. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 92(1): 31-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1985.tb01045.x

Giordano R, Cacciatore A, Romano M, La Rosa B, Fonti I, Vigna R. Uterine artery Doppler flow studies in Obstetrics practice. J Prenat Med. 2010; 4(4): 59-62

Schulman H, Fleischer A, Farmakides G, Bracero L, Grunfeld L. Development of uterine artery compliance in pregnancy as detected by Doppler Ultrasound. Ann J Obstet Gynecol. 1986; 155 (5):1031-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(86)90340-6

Bower S, Bewley S, Campbell S. Improved prediction of Pre-eclampsia by 2 stage screening of uterine arteries using the early diastolic notch and colour Doppler imaging. Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 82(1): 78-83.

Gupta KK, Attri JP, Singh A, Kaur H, Kaur G. Basic concepts for sample size calculation: Critical step for any clinical trials! Saudi J Anaesth. 2016;10:328–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.174918

Barker Brooks. The basics of umbilical artery velocimetry. www.ogpnews.com/2009/09/the-basics-of-umbilical-artery-velocimetry. 1st September, 2009. Accessed 17th December, 2020.

Adekanmi AJ, Roberts A, Akinmoladin JA, Adeyinka AO. Uterine and umbilical artery Doppler in women with Pre-eclampsia and their pregnancy outcomes. NPMJ. 2019; 26(2): 106-11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_161_18

Published

06-09-2024

How to Cite

Chikezie, R. U., Nwali, M. I., Ikeotuonye, A., Ugo-chikezie, N., Anidiobi, F. N., Dimejesi, I. B. O., Uchendu, E., & Onuchukwu, V. (2024). The place of uterine artery and umbilical artery doppler in prediction of hypertensive disorders (pre-eclampsia) among pregnant women at a resource poor setting: A comparative study. International Journal of Health Sciences, 8(S1), 1127–1141. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v8nS1.15119

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles